Mr. Cranky Pants

Quarter Past Fed
Well
we now know who will be the trivia answer for “who was the man that halted
Roger Federer’s consecutive quarter final streak” the one, thee only Serhiy Stakhovsky. More on him later. The fact is that
yet another sign of the ever weakening force field, that once shielded the
greatest player of all time, is continuing to dissolve. The titles and numbers
behind Federer’s case to be the greatest are all firmly in check but it’s some
of those smaller less heralded feats that make even the most skeptical Federer
observer give him the nod as numero uno. 36 straight quarter finals in grand
slams is a record that is truly extraordinary. Hey even winning a slam isn’t as
potent a case for greatness course Gastón Gaudio and Thomas Johansson may say otherwise. Federer’s streak is forever etched in the tennis
history books but what about the stories of Federer yet to be told? Was this
just a slip up? Will order as we knew it be restored? Or will this open the
door to fans, writers and even Federer himself accepting the fact that, despite
10 years of proving otherwise, early round upsets can happen to everyone. EVEN Federer?
Northern Perspective
Well it really is
who does what and where it’s done that matters. Wimbledon 2013 was yet again a
major disappointment for Milos Raonic in a country that is now starting to
doubt and tune out the once sought after prospect of the North. The chats went
from “ this Canadian Roanic is good eh, finally a Canadian tennis player with
some hope” to “ I guess Raonic was flash in the pan eh?” No joke. The amount of
people that represent those extremes and talk to me about it after every
tournament is staggering. In reality though it is good to hear. While 2nd round
upsets are not what Canadians want nor expect, the anger or disappointment
proves how ready the nation is to celebrate a tennis star. In my opinion I pin
pointed when this Raonic struggle began. That being said, the “why” it has
happened still eludes me. The irony of this all dates back to Canada’s huge
Davis Cup win over Italy where Raonic locked up the tie and set up Canada’s
first ever semi final date. The post match interview struck me as odd. The well
spoken and laid back Raonic, caught up in extreme emotion, was rather
boisterous and at times rude with his interviewer. While he seemed on cloud 9
with the win, Raonic made it very clear that there was work to be done and this
was not the extent of the heights he envisions for Canada. On one hand it’s
great to hear but I remember thinking to myself, lets enjoy this! Not just
cause we move to the clay courts next tie to take on Djokovic and the Serbs but
because this was an achievement to celebrate and enjoy. My concern is perhaps
Milos is trying too hard to carry a country on his back without realizing how
much he’s done for Canada already.
Then there is Genie Bouchard... her third round Wimbledon was a success story on so many
levels. A huge win over former number 1 Ana Ivanovic on centre Court probably
topped the cake but it was more than the result on the grass, one year removed
from winning the girls Wimbledon title, the talk at bars, groceries stores,
water coolers was “hey how about that Canadian girl Bouchard” it was amazing to
hear and even greater to be able to stand proud and reply “ya, she’s doing
great”!
Draw Breakers
Tennis is not a sport that appreciates an upset. I firmly agree with those who said this first. While the
2013 Wimbledon draw was rife with them there was very few underdogs getting any
love whatsoever. The fact is, in a sport that is one on one, you need both the
"ones" to be intriguing storylines at the very least. And even though Stakhovsky
was definitely a storyline 48 hours ago to the fans who paid top dollar to see
Federer play in round 3, the Ukrainian was an undisputed heel. But its not just the upset that potentially
ruins a draw it’s the follow up by the underdog that really grinds the gears of
the tennis fan. All too often and history shows this, a major upset does NOTHING to boost
a player from obscurity into seizing momentum and making a play deep in the
draw. Look at this year for example. Stako falls next round after stunning
Federer. Darcis fails to even get on the court after taking out Nadal. De Brito
took out Maria Sharapova then swiftly followed her on a flight out of town.
Even last year… Rosol decided that beating Nadal was a great way to end a
tournament, even if it was only round 2. Its part of tennis. A really really annoying part that has no
answers. We just need to hope it happens as little as possible. It’s the beauty
of the draw but at the same time, the beast. But this problem dates back many
years. Remember when Pete Sampras lost his 4th round Wimbledon match
to a certain Swiss player who next round bowed out routinely to Tim Henman? Wait,
okay maybe scratch that guy from this argument. He ended up doing ok in the end.
THANKS
Okay everyone thanks for reading this blog! Starting soon with my next blog there is going to be some exciting changes to GAME SET N BLOG ! Please stick with me and I promise things will only get better! Thanks for the support. It has been overwhelming. Follow me on twitter at "maydaypelligra" to stay tuned with my announcements!
No comments:
Post a Comment